Anglers use both fluorocarbon and monocarbon fishing lines. Fluoro or fluorocarbon fishing line is a relatively new type made from a synthetic material called polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF).
Fluoro lines have a refractive index close to water’s, making them nearly invisible underwater.
This can be of great benefit, especially in clear water and when fishing for wary fish.
Fluoro lines also have a lower stretch than mono, which can help with sensitivity and hook setting.
Mono, short for monofilament, is the more traditional fishing line. Single-strand nylon is used in its construction, which makes it relatively stretchy.
Mono lines are known for their versatility and affordability. They are available in various colors and sizes.
Differences between Fluorocarbon vs Mono
| Fluoro | Mono |
|---|---|
| Made from a synthetic material called PVDF. | Nylon strands are used to make this product. |
| Nearly invisible underwater due to its close refractive index to water. | Versatile and affordable. |
| Offers superior invisibility and sensitivity. | Available in a range of colors and sizes. |
| Has a lower stretch than mono, aiding in sensitivity and hook setting. | More stretchy than Fluoro. |
| Compared to mono, this is more expensive. | Easier to work with and tie knots. |
| Knots can be harder to tie with it. | Less invisible in the water compared to Fluoro. |
Choosing between Fluoro and mono fishing lines depends on personal preference and specific fishing conditions.
Fluoro excels in clear water or targeting wary fish, offering better invisibility and sensitivity.
Mono is more versatile, affordable, and easier to handle but lacks the same invisibility and sensitivity as Fluoro.
3 Types of fishing lines
Monofilament fishing line
Monofilament fishing lines, often called monos, consist of one nylon or synthetic material strand.
It is one of the most commonly used fishing lines due to its versatility and affordability.
Here are some key features and characteristics of monofilament fishing line:
Stretch: Monofilament has a relatively high amount of stretch compared to other fishing lines.
This stretch can be advantageous when shock absorption is needed, such as targeting large fish or using light tackle. The stretch helps to reduce the risk of the line breaking.
Knot Strength: It is relatively easy to tie various types of knots with monofilament, making it convenient for anglers to secure hooks, lures, and other terminal tackle.
Buoyancy: In water, monofilament does not sink or float. This characteristic allows anglers to control the depth at which their baits or lures are presented.
Abrasion Resistance: While monofilament is not as abrasion-resistant as other fishing lines like braided lines or fluorocarbon, it still offers a reasonable resistance level to abrasion.
However, it’s important to note that abrasion can weaken monofilament over time and with heavy use.
Versatility: Monofilament fishing line is suitable for various fishing applications. It can be used in fresh and saltwater environments, making it a versatile choice for anglers targeting various fish species.
Visibility: However, the visibility can be reduced using lines with lower diameters and lighter color options.
It is a reliable choice for different fishing techniques and suitable for anglers of all skill levels.
Fluorocarbon fishing line
A Fluorocarbon fishing line, commonly called “fluoro,” is made from a synthetic material called polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF).
Here are some key features and characteristics of fluorocarbon fishing line:
Invisibility: One of the primary advantages of the fluorocarbon fishing line is its near-invisibility underwater.
Density: Fluorocarbon is denser than water, which causes it to sink more quickly and stay submerged.
This characteristic is advantageous for certain fishing techniques, such as deep or bottom fishing, as it allows for a more natural presentation of baits or lures.
Abrasion Resistance: Fluorocarbon fishing line is highly resistant to abrasion. It is less likely to get damaged by rocks, structures, or fish with rough mouths, enhancing its longevity.
Sensitivity: Fluorocarbon has less stretch compared to monofilament fishing lines, providing increased sensitivity.
This characteristic allows anglers to detect subtle bites or changes in lure action, enhancing their ability to feel and respond to fish activity.
UV Resistance: Fluorocarbon fishing line has good UV resistance, making it less prone to degradation or weakening when exposed to sunlight over extended periods.
Low Water Absorption: Fluorocarbon has low water absorption, meaning it does not soak up water like other fishing lines.
This property helps to maintain the line’s strength, knot integrity, and overall performance in different fishing conditions.
It’s important to note that fluorocarbon fishing line tends to be stiffer and less flexible than monofilament, and this stiffness can make handling and tying certain knots slightly more challenging.
However, with some practice, anglers can effectively work with fluorocarbon lines.
Fluorocarbon fishing line is commonly used for applications where invisibility and sensitivity are crucial, such as finesse fishing, clear water fishing, or when targeting highly pressured fish.
It can be used in fresh and saltwater environments, offering versatility to anglers pursuing various species.
Braided line
A braid fishing line is made by weaving together multiple strands of synthetic fibers such as Spectra or Dyneema.
It is known for its high strength, minimal stretch, and thin diameter compared to other fishing lines.
Here are some key features and characteristics of braid fishing line:
Strength: Braid lines have exceptional tensile strength and are much stronger than monofilament and fluorocarbon lines of the same diameter.
This high strength-to-diameter ratio allows anglers to use thinner lines while maintaining the same or even higher strength compared to other lines.
Low Stretch: Braid fishing lines have minimal stretch, offering excellent sensitivity and the ability to feel even the slightest bites or changes in lure action. This low stretch also helps with improved hook sets, allowing anglers to quickly and effectively set the hook on fish.
Thin Diameter: Braid lines are thin compared to monofilament and fluorocarbon lines of similar strength.
This thin diameter provides several benefits, including increased line capacity on reels, improved casting distance, and reduced water resistance for better lure action.
Abrasion Resistance: Braid lines offer good resistance to abrasion, making them suitable for fishing in rough or rocky areas.
However, they are more susceptible to sharp objects’ damage than fluorocarbon lines.
High Visibility: Braid fishing lines are highly visible in the water due to their composition and lack of refractive index matching.
While this visibility can be a disadvantage in clear water or when targeting line-shy fish, it can also be advantageous when fishing in low-light conditions or where anglers must detect line movement or bites visually.
No Memory: Braid lines have minimal memory, meaning they do not retain spool memory or hold coils like monofilament lines.
This characteristic reduces tangles and allows for smoother casting and retrieval.
Braid fishing lines are commonly used in applications that require strength, sensitivity, and low stretch, such as fishing in heavy cover, offshore fishing, or targeting larger fish species.
When using braid as the mainline, anglers often attach a monofilament or fluorocarbon leader to provide added stealth or shock absorption.
What are the Advantages of Fluoro vs mono?
Advantages of Fluorocarbon
Invisibility: Fluorocarbon lines are nearly invisible underwater due to their refractive index closely matching water.
This property can be advantageous when targeting wary or line-shy fish in clear or heavily pressured waters.
Abrasion Resistance: Fluorocarbon lines have high abrasion resistance, making them more durable and suitable for fishing around structures, rocks, or other potential line-damaging objects.
Sinkability: Fluorocarbon lines have a higher density than water, causing them to sink more quickly. This property can be beneficial when fishing at greater depths or using sinking baits or lures.
Sensitivity: Fluorocarbon lines have less stretch than monofilament, providing increased sensitivity.
Advantages of Monofilament:
Versatility: Monofilament lines can be used for various fishing techniques and applications.
They work well in various fishing scenarios, including freshwater and saltwater fishing.
Knot Strength: Monofilament lines generally have good knot strength and are easier to handle when tying knots. This can be beneficial for anglers who frequently change lures or rigs.
Manageability: Monofilament lines are more forgiving regarding line memory and tangles.
They are generally easier to handle and manage compared to fluorocarbon lines.
Cost: Monofilament lines are typically more affordable compared to fluorocarbon lines.
This makes them cost-effective, especially for budget anglers or those requiring frequent line changes.
How many types of fishing lines
Several fishing lines are available, each with its characteristics and uses. Monofilament (Mono): Monofilament fishing lines are made from a single strand of nylon or other synthetic materials.
They are versatile, affordable, and offer good knot strength, and mono lines have a higher stretch and are suitable for various fishing applications.
Fluorocarbon (Fluoro): Fluorocarbon fishing lines are made from a synthetic material called polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF).
They are known for their near-invisibility underwater, high abrasion resistance, and low water absorption.
Fluoro lines are commonly used for clear-water fishing and finesse techniques.
Braided (Braid): Braided fishing lines are made by weaving multiple strands of synthetic fibers like Spectra or Dyneema.
They have exceptional strength, minimal stretch, and thin diameters.
Braid lines offer high sensitivity and increased casting distance and are commonly used in heavy cover or for targeting larger fish species.
Wire fishing lines are used when toothy fish like pike or muskie are targeted, as they resist their sharp teeth.
Fly Line: Fly lines are specifically designed for fly fishing, where the weight of the line is used to cast lightweight artificial flies.
Lead Core: Lead core fishing lines consist of a braided sheath with a lead center core.
They are primarily used in trolling applications to achieve specific depth control by varying the amount of line let out.
Ice Fishing Line: Ice fishing lines are specialized for cold weather conditions. They are usually low-stretch and have properties that prevent them from becoming stiff in freezing temperatures.
Each type has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice depends on factors such as fishing technique, target species, water conditions, and personal preferences.
Fluoro vs mono leader
Anglers commonly use fluorocarbon and monofilament leaders to connect the main fishing line (braid) and the terminal tackle (hooks or lures).
Here’s a comparison of Fluoro and mono leaders:
Fluorocarbon Leader
Invisibility: Fluorocarbon leaders are known for their near-invisibility underwater, and they have a refractive index that closely matches water’s, making them less visible to fish.
Abrasion Resistance: Fluorocarbon leaders have high abrasion resistance, making them durable and able to withstand rough conditions or contact with structures and sharp objects.
Sinkability: Fluorocarbon leaders have a higher density than water, causing them to sink quickly and stay submerged. This property can help with naturally presenting baits or lures.
Low Stretch: Fluorocarbon leaders have less stretch than monofilament, which improves sensitivity and allows for better detection of subtle bites or changes in lure action.
Monofilament Leader
Knot Strength: Monofilament leaders have excellent knot strength and are relatively easy to tie knots with.
Versatility: In various fishing situations and techniques used, Monofilament leaders.
Buoyancy: Monofilament leaders have neutral buoyancy, neither sinking nor floating, allowing anglers to control the depth at which their baits or lures are presented.
Cost: Monofilament leaders are generally more affordable than fluorocarbon leaders.
Choosing between Fluoro and mono leaders depends on several factors, including the fishing conditions, target species, and angler preferences.
They are commonly used in finesse fishing or situations where stealth is crucial.
Monofilament works well when visibility is less of a concern or when a more forgiving leader is desired.
Mono vs fluorocarbon for spinning reels
Both monofilament and fluorocarbon lines can be used effectively on spinning reels, but there are some differences to consider when choosing between the two for this application.
Monofilament for Spinning Reels
Ease of Use: Monofilament lines are generally more manageable and easier to handle than fluorocarbon.
They are more forgiving when it comes to line memory and tangles, making them easier to cast and manage on spinning reels.
Buoyancy: Monofilament lines have neutral buoyancy, neither sinking nor floating.
This characteristic can be advantageous when using topwater lures or suspending baits, as the line won’t interfere with the desired action of the lure.
Cost: Monofilament lines are typically more affordable than fluorocarbon lines, making them a cost-effective option for spinning reel setups.
Stretch: Monofilament has a higher amount of stretch compared to fluorocarbon.
This stretch can act as a shock absorber, reducing the risk of line breaks when fighting fish on lighter tackle.
Fluorocarbon for Spinning Reels
Invisibility: Fluorocarbon lines have near-invisibility underwater due to their refractive index closely matching that of water.
This property can be advantageous in clear water or when targeting line-shy finicky fish.
Abrasion Resistance: Fluorocarbon lines have excellent abrasion resistance, making them more durable and suitable for fishing around structures or rough conditions.
Sinkability: Fluorocarbon lines have a higher density than water, causing them to sink more quickly.
This characteristic can be beneficial when using sinking lures or fishing at greater depths.
Sensitivity: Fluorocarbon lines have less stretch than monofilament, providing increased sensitivity and allowing anglers to feel subtle bites or changes in lure action.
Ultimately, the choice between monofilament and fluorocarbon for spinning reels depends on personal preference, fishing conditions, and target species.
Monofilament is often favored for its ease of use, forgiveness, and cost-effectiveness.
Fluorocarbon is preferred when invisibility, abrasion resistance, and sensitivity are paramount.
Some anglers also choose to use a combination of both, with a fluorocarbon leader attached to a monofilament mainline, to take advantage of the benefits of both types of lines.
Mono or Fluoro for saltwater
Both options have advantages and considerations when choosing between monofilament (mono) and fluorocarbon (Fluoro) fishing lines for saltwater fishing.
Here’s a comparison to help you make an informed decision:
Monofilament for Saltwater
Shock Absorption: Monofilament lines have a higher stretch compared to fluorocarbon.
This stretch is a shock absorber, particularly useful when targeting powerful saltwater species that make aggressive runs or sudden movements.
Versatility: Mono lines can be used for a wide range of saltwater fishing applications, from bottom fishing to trolling or casting.
They offer good knot strength and are relatively easy to handle.
Buoyancy: Monofilament has neutral buoyancy, neither sinking nor floating.
This property can be advantageous when using floating baits or lures, allowing for a more natural presentation.
Fluorocarbon for Saltwater
Invisibility: Fluorocarbon lines are nearly invisible underwater due to their refractive index closely matching water.
This makes them advantageous in clear or highly pressured saltwater environments where fish are more likely to be line-shy.
Abrasion Resistance: Fluorocarbon lines have high abrasion resistance, making them more durable and suitable for saltwater conditions where there may be contact with rocks, coral, or other structures.
Low Water Absorption: Fluorocarbon has low water absorption, which helps maintain its strength and performance over time, even in saltwater environments.
Sinking Capability: Fluorocarbon lines have a higher density than water, causing them to sink more quickly.
This property can be beneficial when targeting saltwater species that dwell closer to the bottom or when using sinking baits or lures.
Considerations
Budget: Mono lines are generally more affordable than fluorocarbon lines, which may be a consideration if you anticipate frequent line changes or fishing in harsh conditions where line damage is more likely.
Target Species and Fishing Technique: The specific saltwater species you’re targeting and the fishing technique you’ll be using can also influence your choice.
For example, fluorocarbon may be advantageous if you target line-shy species in clear water or use finesse techniques.
It’s worth noting that many saltwater anglers often opt for a combination approach, using a monofilament or braided mainline with a fluorocarbon leader.
This allows them to take advantage of the benefits of both lines, with the fluorocarbon leader providing invisibility and abrasion resistance at the terminal tackle.
At the same time, the mainline offers shock absorption and versatility.
Ultimately, the choice between mono and Fluoro for saltwater fishing depends on your specific fishing conditions, target species, and personal preferences.
Fluorocarbon vs monofilament for trout
When fishing for trout, fluorocarbon and monofilament lines have advantages and considerations.
Here’s a comparison to help you make an informed decision:
Fluorocarbon for Trout
Invisibility: Fluorocarbon lines are nearly invisible underwater due to their refractive index closely matching water.
This property can be advantageous when targeting wary trout in clear or highly pressured waters.
Sensitivity: This characteristic enhances sensitivity, allowing you to detect subtle bites or changes in lure action when targeting trout.
Abrasion Resistance: Fluorocarbon lines have high abrasion resistance, making them more durable and suitable for fishing in areas with rocks, snags, or other potential line-damaging structures.
Sinkability: Fluorocarbon lines have a higher density than water, causing them to sink more quickly.
This can be advantageous when fishing for trout that dwell at various depths or when using sinking baits or nymphs.
Monofilament for Trout
Versatility: Monofilament lines can be used for many trout fishing techniques, from casting dry flies to drifting nymphs or spinners. They offer good knot strength and are relatively easy to handle.
Shock Absorption: Monofilament lines have a higher stretch compared to fluorocarbon.
This stretch is a shock absorber, particularly useful when trout make sudden runs or jumps.
Buoyancy: Monofilament has neutral buoyancy, neither sinking nor floating.
This property can be advantageous when using floating baits, dry flies, or topwater presentations.
Considerations
Water Clarity: If you’re fishing in clear or highly pressured waters where trout are particularly wary, fluorocarbon’s invisibility can give you an advantage.
Fishing Technique: The specific fishing technique you plan to use can also influence your choice.
For example, fluorocarbon’s sensitivity and invisibility may be beneficial if you primarily use lightweight lures, flies, or fishing with finesse techniques.
Budget: Monofilament lines are generally more affordable than fluorocarbon, which may be considered if you anticipate frequent line changes or fishing in areas with potential line damage.
Remember that trout fishing can vary depending on factors such as the size of the trout, water conditions, and specific fishing techniques employed.
Some anglers may even choose to use a combination approach, such as a fluorocarbon leader attached to a monofilament mainline, to take advantage of the benefits of both lines.
Choosing between fluorocarbon and monofilament for trout fishing depends on your fishing conditions, target species, and personal preferences.
Mono or Fluoro for bass
Both monofilament and fluorocarbon lines have their advantages and considerations when it comes to bass fishing. Here’s a comparison to help you make an informed decision:
Monofilament for Bass
Versatility: Monofilament lines can be used for various bass fishing techniques, such as casting, flipping, and topwater fishing. They offer good knot strength and are relatively easy to handle.
Buoyancy: Monofilament has neutral buoyancy, neither sinking nor floating. This property can be advantageous when using floating baits or topwater presentations for bass.
Shock Absorption: Monofilament lines have a higher stretch compared to fluorocarbon. This stretch is a shock absorber, particularly useful when bass makes sudden runs or jumps.
Cost: Monofilament lines are generally more affordable compared to fluorocarbon lines, which may be a consideration if you anticipate frequent line changes or fishing in areas with potential line damage.
Fluorocarbon for Bass
Invisibility: Fluorocarbon lines are nearly invisible underwater due to their refractive index closely matching water. This property can be advantageous when targeting finicky or line-shy bass, especially in clear or highly pressured waters.
Sensitivity: This characteristic enhances sensitivity, allowing you to feel subtle bites or changes in lure action when targeting bass.
Abrasion Resistance: Fluorocarbon lines have high abrasion resistance, making them more durable and suitable for fishing around cover or structures where bass may be hiding.
Sinkability: Fluorocarbon lines have a higher density than water, causing them to sink more quickly. This can be advantageous when fishing for bass at various depths or using sinking baits or techniques.
Considerations
Water Clarity and Bass Behavior: If you’re fishing in clear or highly pressured waters where the bass is particularly wary, fluorocarbon’s invisibility can give you an advantage.
Additionally, monofilament may be viable if the bass is more aggressive and less line-shy.
Fishing Technique: The specific fishing technique you plan to use can also influence your choice.
For example, fluorocarbon’s sensitivity and invisibility may be beneficial if you’re primarily using finesse techniques, such as drop shotting or lightweight lures.
Budget: Monofilament lines are generally more affordable compared to fluorocarbon, which may be a consideration if you anticipate frequent line changes or fishing in areas with potential line damage.
It’s worth noting that many bass anglers often opt for a combination approach, using a fluorocarbon leader attached to a monofilament or braided mainline.
This allows them to take advantage of the benefits of both lines, with the fluorocarbon leader providing invisibility and abrasion resistance at the terminal tackle while the mainline offers versatility and shock absorption.
Ultimately, the choice between fluorocarbon and monofilament for bass fishing depends on your fishing conditions, target species, specific techniques, and personal preferences.
What are the disadvantages of fluorocarbon?
While fluorocarbon lines have several advantages, they also have some potential disadvantages compared to monofilament lines.
Cost: Fluorocarbon lines are generally more expensive than monofilament lines.
If you require frequent line changes or are on a tight budget, the cost of fluorocarbon can be a significant factor to consider.
Stiffness: Fluorocarbon lines tend to be stiffer than monofilament lines, and this stiffness can make them more challenging to handle and manage, especially when casting and tying knots.
The stiffness can also lead to reduced casting distance and impact lure action.
Reduced Knot Strength: Fluorocarbon lines are more prone to knot failures than monofilament.
Ensuring proper knot-tying techniques and using appropriate knots to maintain good knot strength with fluorocarbon is crucial.
Limited Stretch: Fluorocarbon lines have less stretch than monofilament, which can result in less shock absorption and increased risk of line breakage, particularly when targeting hard-fighting fish or using lighter tackle.
Memory and Line Memory: Fluorocarbon lines have more memory than monofilament.
This means they are more prone to retain the shape of the spool and forming coils, resulting in tangles and reduced casting performance.
Line memory can be a particular concern in cold weather conditions.
Lower Impact Strength: Fluorocarbon lines are generally less resistant to sudden impacts or shock loads than monofilament.
This means they may be more prone to breaking or suffering damage when encountering sudden and strong forces, such as aggressive strikes or heavy hooksets.
Environmental Impact: Fluorocarbon is not biodegradable, which can be a concern for environmentally conscious anglers.
It’s important to note that these disadvantages are not absolute for all fluorocarbon lines and can vary depending on the specific brand, quality, and fishing conditions.
Which floats better, mono or fluorocarbon?
Regarding buoyancy, monofilament lines generally float better than fluorocarbon lines.
Monofilament has neutral buoyancy, meaning it neither sinks nor floats, whereas fluorocarbon lines have a higher density than water and tend to sink more quickly.
The buoyancy of a fishing line can have implications for different fishing techniques.
For example, suppose you’re using topwater lures or fishing with floating baits. In that case, the buoyancy of monofilament can be advantageous as it allows for a more natural presentation on the water’s surface.
The neutral buoyancy of monofilament also makes it easier to control the depth at which your bait or lure floats.
On the other hand, fluorocarbon’s sinking capability can be beneficial when fishing with sinking baits or nymphs or when you want your presentation to reach greater depths quickly.
The higher density of fluorocarbon allows it to sink faster, getting your bait or lure down to the desired depth more efficiently.
It’s important to note that the buoyancy of both monofilament and fluorocarbon lines can vary depending on the specific brand and diameter of the line.
Thinner diameter lines tend to have less buoyancy and may sink more quickly than thicker lines of the same material.
Monofilament is generally the preferred choice if you’re looking for a fishing line with better floatability.
However, fluorocarbon’s sinking capability can be advantageous if you need a line that sinks quickly or prefers a more subtle presentation underwater.
Conclusion
Some anglers may mitigate these disadvantages through proper line management, careful knot tying, and adjusting their fishing techniques.
Choosing between fluorocarbon and monofilament lines should consider balancing their advantages and disadvantages based on your fishing preferences, target species, and specific fishing conditions.
Mono lines are more affordable and easier to work with but have more stretch and are less invisible in the water.
See the White vs Black Crappie on our website.